See Also: The Westerly Precinct and the Shape of Sudbury <> Historical Maps of Sudbury <> jch.com/history <> Hudson 1889 <> History Books <> Before the English <> Sudbury Town Bounds

YON - Jan C. Hardenbergh

Westerly Towns

Many towns in Massachussetts were split off of larger "mother" towns. Weston & Waltham were split from Watertown. This is an attempt at showing the earliest boundaries of the town around. See the Original Concord Map. I need to look at Dedham, Massachusetts, 1635-1890 / by Robert Brand Hanson!!

image WestTownGrants1640.jpg
Sudbury is one of 3 inland towns
image WestTownsZoom.jpg
WestTownsZoom

When the early towns were incorporated

The map above gives a date of incorporation for each of the six towns it colours. None of these towns has a colonial act of incorporation. The "On the map" column repeats the map's legend; Salem and Boston are among the coastal towns the map does not colour. The Date column gives the date from which each can be considered a corporation in fact, and how that standing arose. Dates are Old Style.

TownOn the mapDateConsidered a corporation byWhy
Salemnot colouredBefore 1629Usage (prescription)Existed before the colony's government arrived; never created by any order
Charlestown1630Before 1630Usage (prescription)Settled and treated as a town with no founding order
Bostonnot coloured7 Sep 1630Usage, recognised by the naming orderThe order names an existing settlement; it creates nothing
Watertown16307 Sep 1630Usage, recognised by the naming orderSame order, same reasoning
Cambridge16361630–31; renamed May 1638Usage, recognised by the renamingSettled as Newtowne with no founding order
Concord16352 Sep 1635GrantThe Court's order that there be a plantation at Musketaquid, six miles square, to be called Concord
Dedham16368 Sep 1636GrantThe Court's order on the settlers' petition
Sudbury16394 Sep 1639GrantThe Court's order on the inhabitants' petition

All eight became corporations by law under the Act of 1785, which declared the inhabitants of every town a body politic and corporate.

"Usage" means the town was settled first and recognised afterwards; no order created it. "Grant" means a General Court order created the plantation on a petition, which is the nearest thing to a charter.

Every date here is from memory and unverified, except Sudbury's 4 September 1639, which is from the Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England. AI assist: Claude Opus 5.5 as prompted by jch.com/jch - YON - Jan C. Hardenbergh

Lancaster Highway on Haynes Map In 1653, the General Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony ordered a road built from Sudbury to Lancaster. After it rounds Goodman's Hill and gets up to what is now Hudson Road, it essentially divides the Town in half. We know the middle part of this as Old Lancaster Road. It ran up from the river along the current Wolbach Road connected with Cato road. It is a reference point for many land transactions.

Billerica Dam might come down!!! TALBOT MILLS DAM REMOVAL other notes The boatman : Henry David Thoreau's river years <> Middlesex Canal

Freemen

Walter Haynes was Born 1583, Age 55 in 1638. died Feb. 14, 1665. __ Hudson says about him: In his history of Sudbury, Hudson says of him: He was a freeman May 13,1641. He represented the town in the General Court in the years 1641, 14,'48 and '51, and was a selectman ten years. Mr. Haynes was probably one of the first grantees to erect a house on the west side of the river, which house was probably the “Haynes Garrison."

Freeman. What does that mean? It clearly means one is not a slave or other form of servant. There were many indentured servants that had their ships passage paid for. Depending on the contract, they may be indentured for 1-4 years and the may receive land upon completion of their service. For example, Walter Haynes brought three men with him: John Blanford, John Riddot, Rich Biddlecomb. John Blandfold stayed in Sudbury and I assume Blandfold Pond on Cavvichio's land is named for him or a descendent. However, John Blandfold is not in the Colony's list of Freemen before 1650.

Not a servant, a member of a church, and take the oath.

P.67 Town Records 1 - the Oath.
I, being by Gods providence an Inhabitant within this Jurisdiction doe truly and solemnly acknowledge myself to be subject to the government of the same, and therefore doe here sware by the great and dreadful' name of the ever livinge God that I will be true and faithful to the same and will accordingly yield Assistance thereunto with my person and that as in equity I am bound. And I will allsoe truely endeavour to maintayne and preserve the libertyes and privileges thereof submittinge myselfe to the wholesome lawes made and established by the same. And further that I will not plott or practice any evill against it nor consult with any that shall soe doe, but will tymely discover the same to lawful Authority now here established for the suppressinge of the same soe help me God and the Lord Jesus Christ.

I assume taking the oath is what made Walter Haynes a freeman in 1641.

---------- Powell, Puritan Village p.100
The phrase "free townsman" was very similar, of course, to the same phrase used in the old borough of Sudbury. But the new Sudbury had a very different philosophy. All male adult citizens, once sanctioned by a town-meeting vote and given a grant of common land, were considered free townsmen. For this privilege, they were expected to live in Sudbury, pay all taxes, and be called on to serve in any town post which the town meeting decided was necessary for that particular year.

The Puritans expected everyone to contribute and to work the land they had, other wise the town would reassign it.

---------- Powell, Puritan Village
Where Watertown's first records cited "the Freemen" as a source of local political authority, Sudbury's governing body hardly used the term at all Now and then Noyes, Pendleton, Haynes, and Goodnow signed as "freemen" in the first five years, but the overwhelming majority of the early laws stated boldly, "ordered and agreed by the inhabitants of this Town of Sudbury."

References

History of Sudbury Massachusetts 1638-1889     Alfred S. Hudson     1889     Town of Sudbury
Puritan Village: The Formation of a New England TownSumner Chilton Powell1963Wesleyan University Press
A Puritan Village EvolvesHelen Fitch Emery1981Wayland Historical Commission
A Brief History of the Towne of Sudbury in Mass 1639-1939     Federal Writers*1987Sudbury Historical Society
Descendants of Walter Haynes and Peter Noyes, of Sudbury, Mass.     Frederick Haynes Newell1893Privately Published

2026-10-13 jch.com/history/WesterlyPrecinct/WesterlyTowns.html <> jch, aka YON - Jan C. Hardenbergh